Syria Is Putin’s Call

As we watch atrocities unfold in Syria, some are asking why we don’t intervene there as we did in Libya.  Part of the answer is that there isn’t a rebel group in control of territory whom we could support with airstrikes.  The Syrian military is much better armed than the Libyan military was because of the Russians.

And that’s the big difference and the real story here — Russia.  Syria has been consistently and closely allied with Russia going all the way back to 1955, when Russia was part of the Soviet Union.  So that relationship of Syria as Soviet/Russian client state and major arms recipient predates the rise of the Assad family to power, which began with Hafez al-Assad in 1971.

Right now, Syria is Russia’s main source of influence in the Middle East.  Putin is going to do everything he can to maintain that power, and as long as he thinks Bashar al-Assad is good for Russia, Putin will support him and keep sending him weapons.

This isn’t a situation where Russia is on our side or is neutral, they are on the other side, and they don’t want anyone messing with their 67-year alliance.

Iran is also involved here.  Syria is Iran’s only Arab ally.  In general, the Arabs don’t like the Persian Iranians.  Iran uses Syria to provide support for Hamas and Hezbollah.

We wanted to get rid of Qaddafi?  Russia and Iran said, Knock yourself out.  We want to get rid of al-Assad?  Different story.

6 comments on “Syria Is Putin’s Call

  1. The slaughter of innocent children by Assad should bring tears to Putin’s eyes. Tha Ayatollah and Imadinnerjacket, that’s another story.

    • Dream on about bringing tears to Putin’s eyes.
      No Administration has ever challenged Soviet Union’s/Russia’s relationship with Syria. We’ve accepted it going back to Ike.

    • Putin is neo-soviet KGB dictator and friend of each and every dictator in the world.
      He started a persecution of people in his own country just for being different, including children and youths.
      WHAT are you saying about tears in his eyes? This bloodlusty spawn of bolsheviks deserves only shameful fate of Qaddafi.

  2. Insightful post. And speaking for myself, I’m glad we’re not getting involved. We’re entangled in too many places already.

    I’m glad I found your blog and have subscribed. Keep ’em coming.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s