Mitt Can’t Lock Up This Big Dog on the Car Roof

From “The Dog and the Preacher,” John Heilemann, New York Magazine:

“In some areas, to be sure, it makes more sense for Clinton to do the talking—welfare reform preeminent among them. For weeks, Team Romney has been pounding Obama for allegedly ‘gutting’ the law that Clinton passed in the nineties by ‘dropping work requirements.’ The ads, which featured images of WJC, have plainly been gaining traction with the working- and middle-class white voters whom the Republican ticket must carry by vast margins to have any hope of winning. In his Charlotte speech, however, Clinton decimated the ads with as much force as he could muster. ‘This is personal to me,’ he said. ‘The claim that President Obama weakened welfare reform’s work requirement is just not true. But they keep on running ads claiming it.’

“For Romney-Ryan, Clinton’s engagement on this issue—and more broadly, as he’s made it clear he wants to hit the road extensively for Obama this fall—is a nightmare. But it is one of their own creation. Had they not elevated Clinton in the first place, putting him in ads, using him as an example of the kind of ‘good Democrat’ that Obama definitively is not, 42’s repudiations of the claims and his validation of 44 might have less purchase. Instead, Team Romney finds itself defenseless, unable to defang the Big Dog, even as Obama counts his lucky stars that the old hound is off the leash.”

The Truth May Set Mitt Free, But It Won’t Get Him Elected

“We’re not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact-checkers.”

Sounds like something Putin might say, doesn’t it?  But this was Neil Newhouse, a Romney pollster, responding to criticism about Mitt’s fact-free ads claiming that President Obama has gutted the work requirements for welfare recipients.

The ads have been helping Mitt among white voters, especially white single women whom he desperately needs, so the ads will continue to run.