Still a lot more questions than answers on the Petraeus “affair” in both the personal and political sense, but it looks as if he may have been forced out because of the GOP. That’s interesting because the GOP claims that the timing of his resignation is suspicious, given the Benghazi hearing later this week.
They can’t both instigate his resignation and accuse the Administration of trying to keep him from testifying. Well, of course, they can, since they’re the GOP, and this is how they roll, with no concern for coherence, but we saw how much good such tactics did Mitt.
As for the GOP being behind his firing, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s office admits that Cantor learned about the FBI investigation that had ensnared Petraeus from GOP Congressman Dave Reichert of Washington. An FBI whistle-blower had contacted Reichert. The whistle-blower then talked to Cantor, who got him directly to FBI Director Robert Mueller.
I’m inferring that the FBI investigation had uncovered the affair between Petraeus and Paula Broadwell, but no security breach or criminal activity involving Petraeus, and so was not going to notify the CIA or Congress or the White House. It sounds as if the whistle-blower disagreed with this result and, bucking his superiors, went to Congress himself. Once Reichert and Cantor got involved, Mueller couldn’t let it lie, setting off the chain of events that led to Petraeus’ resignation.
So the GOP claim that Obama wanted to make Petraeus go away because of Benghazi is BS. And I believe Petraeus will end up testifying anyway, just not this Thursday.