Washington super-lawyer Plato Cacheris is representing Edward Snowden in talks with the Justice Department, seeking a plea deal that would let Snowden come home. If anyone can get Snowden a decent deal, it’s Plato.
From “What was James Rosen thinking?”, Jack Shafer, Reuters:
“Although [Fox News reporter James] Rosen’s story asserts that it is ‘withholding some details about the sources and methods…to avoid compromising sensitive overseas operations,’ the basic detail that the CIA has ‘sources inside North Korea’ privy to its future plans is very compromising stuff all by itself.
“Once the North Koreans read the story, they must have asked if the source of the intel was human or if their communications had been breached. In any event, you can assume that the North Koreans commenced a leak probe that made the U. S. investigation look like the prosecution of a parking ticket.”
I can’t get all wee wee’d up about bumbling James Rosen, who makes Inspector Clouseau look like James Angleton. If the Obama Administration had prosecuted him along with State Department moron Stephen Jin Woo Kim, I’d see the First Amendment threat here, but they didn’t. I do mourn the loss of a source inside North Korea, because God knows they are few and far between, and probably now fewer and farther.
I’m with Josh Marshall from Talking Points Memo on this one:
“They [DOJ] took a step I think they should not have taken. But they did so putting together a case against a government employee who more or less in plain sight (thanks to Rosen, in part) leaked what looks to have been highly classified information about US spy networks overseas. It’s difficult for me not to be more shocked by the self-interested preening of fellow journalists over a comically inept reporter and source than the arguable dangers this episode holds for press freedoms. Indeed, I’ve failed. I can’t.
I can’t either.
Rand Paul has ended his filibuster blocking the vote on John Brennan to be CIA Director.
Why doesn’t somebody filibuster to get stronger gun and ammunition laws? Our kids are bazillion times more likely to be killed by a nut with a gun than Obama with a drone.
And I don’t get this obsession with drones. On May 4, 1970, the Ohio National Guard shot 67 rounds in 13 seconds at Kent State University. Four students died and nine were wounded. Some of them were peacefully protesting the Vietnam War, others were watching the demonstration from a distance, and others just happened to be walking by.
I also feel that Rand Paul and Eric Holder have been talking past each other. Paul keeps using the example of an American sitting in a cafe in the U. S. and getting blown away by a drone. Holder made clear that would be an inappropriate use of lethal force. Where Holder has left the door open a teeny, tiny crack for drone strikes within our borders has been in a Pearl Harbor or 9/11 situation — so an act of war against our country on our soil. In that case, the President as Commander in Chief would be justified in using any weapons we have to defend against such an attack.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) announced that the White House has agreed to provide the Senate Intelligence Committee access to all of the Justice Department drone memos dealing with the targeting of Americans.
The fight over the drone memos has delayed the confirmation of John Brennan to be CIA Director.
The Committee will finally vote on his nomination later today.
Interesting story up at the National Journal* explaining why the President doesn’t want to show the House and Senate Intelligence Committees all of the Justice Department drone memos. The article says it’s because they “contain secret protocols with foreign governments, including Pakistan and Yemen, as well as ‘case-specific’ details of strikes.”
The Administration believes that even if released just to certain members of Congress, the sensitive information would become public and embarrass the governments we have protocols with, which may include additional countries like Mali and Algeria.
This would explain why the Administration is supposedly trying to get John Brennan’s nomination for CIA out of the Senate Intelligence Committee by giving up some Dem votes over the drone memos and going for GOP votes by giving them more info on Benghazi.
National security issues can create some strange bedfellows!
* “What’s in the Secret Drone Memos,” Michael Hirsh and Kristin Roberts
Like me, you’ve probably been wondering when Attorney General Eric Holder learned about the FBI investigation that uncovered Gen. Petraeus’ affair. He found out late this summer.
So when Eric Cantor went to FBI Director Mueller with the FBI whistle-blower in October, Mueller’s boss Holder already knew, so I assume Cantor wasn’t giving Mueller new info, he was telling him, “I know what you know, and if you don’t get it out, I will.”
Newsweek (Dan Klaidman) reports that former car thief Darrell Issa would have cancelled the contempt vote against Attorney General Eric Holder over Fast and Furious if Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, who heads the Criminal Division, resigned.
Matthew Miller, a former Justice communications director, told Klaidman this shows Issa was out for publicity. “The reason that this contempt motion happened is that Issa didn’t come up with any evidence and didn’t get a scalp. When you set expectations that high and you don’t deliver, you have to explain why.”