David Brooks’ new column in the NYT is called “The Gingrich Tragedy.” I would have gone with “The Gingrich Farce,” but whatever the title, it’s an insightful column.
“In the two main Republican contenders, we have one man, Romney, who seems to have walked straight out of the 1950s, and another, Gingrich, who seems to have walked straight out of the 1960s. He has every negative character trait that conservatives associate with ’60s excess: narcissism, self–righteousness, self–indulgence and intemperance. He just has those traits in Republican form.” Emphasis added.
Newtie is a two-year-old in a sixty-eight-year-old’s body. When the Constitution says that the president must be at least 35, I think the founders meant emotionally as well as chronologically. Newtie is the Baby Huey of candidates.
David Brooks has a column in the NYT today praising Mitt “I’m Also Unemployed” Romney and his advisers. Brooks specifically mentions chief economic adviser R. Glenn Hubbard as part of “the gold standard of adviser teams.”
Really? Hubbard was Bush 43’s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, a man who pushed the Bush tax cuts, not just the pre-9/11 ones, but the 2003 cuts, despite our having to pay for two wars. Hubbard was a huge fan of deregulation and derivatives. In other words, Hubbard is high on the list of those who deserve blame for the economic collapse.
I don’t want him anywhere near the White House again. Mr. Brooks, all that glitters is not gold.
In today’s NYT David Brooks writes “at least Republicans respect Americans enough to tell us what they really think.” Apparently he missed yesterday’s article about Mitch Daniels headlined “Republican Calls for a More Honest Debate.” Daniels chided his own party for not being “more candid and honest.”
Republicans tell us what they think the Tea Party wants to hear. They pander to the lowest common denominator of that sorry bunch — the ignorant, pathetic guy with the goofiest costume and the sign with the most misspellings.
If Republicans respected us, they would show a little respect for basic economics, math, and science.