So the L. A. Times is reporting that former House Speaker Denny Hastert’s blackmailer is male and that the “misconduct” was alleged sexual abuse.
John McCain blames the
Benedict Tom Cotton letter ‘splaining our Constitution to Iran on the weather:
“It was kind of a very rapid process. Everybody was looking forward to getting out of town because of the snowstorm. I think we probably should have had more discussion about it, given the blowback that there is.”
There you have it, people. The world’s greatest deliberative body, until a few flakes fall from the sky, inducing panic — and treason.
I don’t ask this question based on Rudy Giuliani’s comment that “I do not believe that the President loves America.” The statement is absurd and nasty, but it doesn’t mean he has dementia.
No, what makes me ask the question is Rudy’s follow-on assertion that “I’m not questioning his patriotism.”
What is patriotism? It’s love of country. So if you argue that Obama doesn’t love America, yet he’s patriotic, there must be something wrong with your brain.
The White House had it exactly right when they said they feel sorry for Rudy.
Nate Silver from FiveThirtyEight.com gives Jeb Bush and Scott Walker each a 25% chance of getting the nomination. He gives Marco Rubio 12%, Rand Paul 9%, and Chris Christie 5%.
I give Paul and Christie 0%.
Sen. Rand Paul says vaccinations cause “profound mental disorders.” So I guess he was vaccinated…
You know, Reince, you can have fewer debates and move up your convention, but the stupid in your party will continue to shine through.
I’m no fan of Mitt Romney, but Mittens was right when he looked at the GOP field and was not impressed. The field is certainly wide. But deep? Not so much.
First of all, aside from entertainment value, you can safely ignore Rick Santorum, Bobby Jindal, Rand Paul, Mike Huckabee, and Ben Carson. None of these guys is going to be the 2016 Republican nominee. Okay, maybe if Hillary finds a magic lamp in some Upper East Side antique store… But let’s assume Alladin isn’t Ready for Hillary.
Ted Cruz probably falls in that group too. Just because you breathe fire, doesn’t mean you’re going to catch fire. “Clueless” and “obnoxious” aren’t high on the list of what voters look for in a candidate.
As for his fellow Texan, Rick Perry, he’ll do better than 2012, being off the pain meds and all. So he’ll be able to remember a list of three. Hell, maybe he’ll do four or five. But he still comes across as dumber and goofier than George W. Bush. He’ll have a less bizarre and humiliating, but still unsuccessful, go this time around.
As for Scott Walker and Marco Rubio, the eyes have it. Watch a clip of Scott Walker with the sound off and just look into his eyes. Not a helluva lot going on there, he’s the poster boy for “dumb look.” Rubio? Watch the water grab in the SOTU response and look at the absolute terror in his eyes. If he panics over a sip of water, how is he going to fare in a room with Putin? Vlad, by the way, wouldn’t give a damn if he needed a sip of water — or vodka — during a speech. Anyone going to snicker at Mr. KGB? I think not. I don’t entirely write either off the way I do the others — Walker could unite the Establishment and the Tea Party and Rubio has some foreign/defense policy chops (especially compared to Walker) in an election where the Mideast Morass will feature prominently. But really, neither one has what it takes.
Chris Christie? Mittens knows more about him than we do from his Veep vet in 2012, and Mittens didn’t like what he learned. Skeletons aside, Christie won’t wear well, we’ll be sick to death of him long before the NH primary. Mitt has been gone just a few days, and Christie is already spouting nonsense about vaccines. When his mouth isn’t full of food, it’s full of bluster and BS.
We come to Jebbie. Mitt looked at him and saw a much less successful version of himself as a businessman. But as a politician, Jeb is far less awkward and off-putting than Mitt. He doesn’t make you cringe. He’ll be the grown-up on the debate stage. He’ll have all the money he needs.
So there you have it, America. A “wide and deep” field — of one.
“But those familiar with Romney’s thinking as he’s been contemplating a run and over the years say that he has held a jaundiced view of the former Florida governor dating all the way back to his handling of the Terri Schiavo case, and has come to see Bush as a non-entity in the 2016 nomination contest. Romney is said to see Bush as a small-time businessman whose financial transactions would nonetheless be fodder for the Democrats and as terminally weighed down with voters across the board based on his family name. Romney also doesn’t think much of Bush’s political skills (a view mocked by Bush’s camp, who say Romney is nowhere near Bush’s league as a campaigner). Romney also considers Bush the national Republican figure who was the least helpful to him during his last run for the White House, a position that has darkened Ann Romney’s view of Bush as well.
“Romney and Christie became friends in the last cycle, but Romney nevertheless has dismissed his pal as a non-factor. Thanks to the 2012 veep vetting process, Romney became intimately familiar with some of the less publicized controversies from the New Jersey governor’s past, and believes that several of those flaps would mushroom so broadly that Christie soon would be eliminated from consideration by voters and donors.”
From “How Mitt Romney Made His Decision Not To Run,” Mark Halperin, Bloomberg Politics