From “Edward Snowden’s nightmare comes true,” Philip Ewing, Politico:
“Snowden’s worst fear, by his own account, was that ‘nothing will change.’
“One month after the Guardian’s first story…there has been no public movement in Washington to stop the [FISA] court from issuing another such order. Congress has no intelligence reform bill that wold rein in the phone-tracking, or Internet monitoring, or cyberattack-planning, or any of the other secret government workings that Snowden’s disclosures have revealed.
“There is no modern-day Sen. Frank Church ready to convene historic hearings about the intelligence community…. Far from having been surprised by Snowden’s disclosures, today’s intelligence committee leaders stepped right up to defend the NSA’s surveillance programs. From Republicans, led by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, to Democrats, including Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, they’ve been nearly unanimous in their support.”
“One of the things for people who obsess about this stuff, like I do, is we don’t know what we’re buying and we don’t know what we’re paying for this service,” [University of Southern California law professor Jack] Lerner said. We’re paying with our privacy, and we had a sense that we’re not paying very much…but we’re learning that maybe there is a cost, and maybe the cost is more than we thought it was.”
My strong sense at this point, with a lot more still to learn, is that we have gone overboard in the name of security at the expense of privacy. We need a Frank Church to get us back in balance.