In his foreign policy speech today at Virginia Military Institute, Mitt showed how out of touch he is with American voters, not just on economic issues, but on military ones as well.
He said that he would have stayed longer in Iraq, when the country as a whole is glad to be out of there: “America’s ability to influence events for the better in Iraq has been undermined by the abrupt withdrawal of our entire troop presence.”
Strategically, we’d be better off today with Saddam Hussien in power as a bulwark and counter-weight to Iran. The problem isn’t that we left, it’s that we went there in the first place.
Mitt said that he won’t be bound by Obama’s promise to get out of Afghanistan by the end of 2014, when the country as a whole would like to get out even sooner: “I will evaluate conditions on the ground and weigh the best advice of our military commanders.”
If Mittens thinks we want to lose more lives and limbs and healthy brains, thinks we want to waste more money we don’t have in either Iraq or Afghanistan, he has no clue how the American people feel about these wars.
The terrorists who threaten us have long since moved on from Afghanistan — across the border to Pakistan, north to Yemen and Somalia — and a big ground war there makes absolutely no sense. This is a war for special forces and drones.
As for Iran’s nuclear quest, where Mitt has criticized Obama for not being tough enough, he spoke of sanctions, not military action: “I will not hesitate to impose new sanctions on Iran and will tighten the sanctions we currently have.” Iran has made it clear that sanctions won’t deter their nuclear ambitions. So Mitt’s saying he’d do more of a failed policy.