Georgia GOP Senate candidate David Perdue says voters should choose him over his Dem opponent Michelle Nunn because her father, former senator Sam Nunn, voted in 1978 to return the Panama Canal.
“What of the two advisers without a specific portfolio: Valerie Jarrett and Dan Pfeiffer? They’re blindly loyal to Obama, gatherers of power, shielded from blame, and accountable to nobody but the president. Their biggest admirers acknowledge privately that Obama won’t change course unless Jarrett and Pfeiffer change work addresses.”
Ron Fournier, National Journal
There’s life in the Empty Barn Jacket, aka Scott Brown, GOP candidate for Senate in New Hampshire. The Cook Report has moved his race against incumbent Jeanne Shaheen from Leans Dem to Toss-up.
Really, New Hampshire? You’re going to vote for a bulb so dim he reminds me of Wisconsin’s Scott Walker, who is truly a moron. You want to cringe through six years of fatuousness from this pathetic pretty boy?
“If the latest round of polls is accurate, Democrats will lose nearly every competitive Senate race, giving Republicans full control of Congress for the first time in 10 years.
This is excellent news for Democrats.
Instead of another two years of the same old gridlock that has turned voters off of both parties, Democrats will get to kick back with a large tub of buttery popcorn and watch the Republican soap opera hit peak suds.
In the House, the Boehner vs. Tea Party plot line will heat up, as several anti-Boehner party rebels are expected to win seats now held by more genteel Republicans. The Senate may end up more like a classic sitcom: Can two grandstanders like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz run for president at the same time without driving the majority leader crazy?
The inconvenient truth for the Republican Party is that it’s not ready for prime time, yet it’s on the verge of fully sharing with the president the responsibility of running the country.”
Bill Scher, “Good News Democrats, You’re Going to Lose!,” Politico
The barn jacket and the pick-up truck have lost their magic. Poor Scott Brown just wants to be in the Senate, people. But having been kicked out by the people of Massachusetts in favor of Elizabeth Warren, his slither across the border to New Hampshire isn’t panning out. He’s trailing another woman, incumbent Dem Jeanne Shaheen, by 12 points — 52 to 40.
And his favorables/unfavorables are upside down at 31 and 40. Hers are right side up at 57-29.
A beat-up Scott may have to toss his carpetbag in that beat-up truck and head back home.
I’ve already noted how bizarre the 2016 contest could be in terms of foreign/defense policy in that we might have a serious GOP candidate (Rand Paul) running to the left of the Dems. Already there’s talk of neo-cons like Robert Kagan supporting Hillary.
But we might also see some strange turns in domestic policy as well. A lot of attention is being paid to Hillary’s attitude toward, and relationship with, Wall Street, particularly compared to Elizabeth Warren. However Hillary runs, you can be sure she’d govern as a friend of Wall Street, as she and Bill have consistently been.
We may well see a “populist” GOP candidate or two in the primary running to the left of Hillary on domestic policy.
What I find especially interesting is the conviction that populist rhetoric should be encouraged among Republicans, combined with a certainty that it would be the kiss of death for the Dems to nominate that “scary” Elizabeth Warren. Candidates are judged not on the content of their character, but on the red or blue color of their party.
While I know that Warren would be turned into George McGovern, the truth is that if Tea Party voters could listen to her in a “blind taste test” setting, a lot of them would feel that she understands their frustration and speaks for them. While she’d be painted as anti-capitalist, the more subtle truth is that she is against crony capitalism, and so is the Tea Party.
Both parties represent crony capitalism, and that’s something the Progressive wing of the Democratic party and the Tea Party wing of the GOP agree on. The Dems are for the rich and the poor, the Republicans are for the rich, but really nobody is for the middle class. That’s why they have to woo middle-class voters and get us wee wee’d up about issues like abortion and immigration and climate change.
All the 2016 candidates will talk about the middle class, but those most likely to mean it either won’t get nominated or would get painted as a hippie Commie freak in the general.
I don’t know who our next president will be, but I’m certain he or she will be someone Wall Street won’t have to worry its pretty little head about.
Now Chelsea Clinton is making a fool of herself on the subject of wealth.
She claims not to care about money, but last year she bought a 5,000 square foot, block-long apartment in Manhattan for $9,250,000 (down from an asking price of $10.5 million).